Lotus Evora 400
Car comparison
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6vsJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful406 hp303 kW
- Lightest1,422 kg3,135 lb
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 3.0 V6
- Highest torque460 Nm339 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions203 g/km
- Best estimated range814 km506 mi
- Best economy score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 406hp303kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 460Nm339lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,422kg3,135lb | 1,594kg3,514lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.0s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 70.8s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 251hp/t187kW/t114hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 619km384mi Calculated | 814km506mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,394mm173in | 4,482mm176in |
| Width | 1,845mm73in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,229mm48in | 1,311mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,575mm101in | 2,622mm103in |
| Front track | 1,564mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,627mm64in |
| Trunk volume | - | 310L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 408L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 225g/km | 203g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,500-6,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 15.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 121 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6 | 400 hp 298 kW |
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 has 6 hp more than Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 and Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6 | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6 | 1,594 kg 3,514 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 4.2 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 3.0 V6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 and Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6 | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 619 km 384 mi |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6 | 814 km 506 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6 | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 406 hp 303 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb | 1,594 kg 3,514 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 619 km 384 mi | 814 km 506 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 225 g/km | 203 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 | Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 172 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 3.0 V6
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 195 km (121 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 22 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























