Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017 2.0vsVolkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014
R 2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight197 hp/t147 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions163 g/km
- Best estimated range875 km544 mi
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score87/100
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Largest trunk312 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,525kg3,362lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 73.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.9s Calculated | 19.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 262Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 875km544mi Calculated | 696km433mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,482mm176in | 4,248mm167in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,310mm52in | 1,398mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,622mm103in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,597mm63in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,649mm65in | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 312L |
| Max trunk volume | 408L | 1,006L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 163g/km | 185g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.9 s | 19.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 105 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW |
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0 has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 5.7 s |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 5.5 s |
Although Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0 has more power, Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0 and Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 875 km 544 mi |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 696 km 433 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 875 km 544 mi | 696 km 433 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 163 g/km | 185 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 312 L 11.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0 | Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 179 km (111 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 22 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























