Car comparison

Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0vsJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche 718 Cayman (982)

2.0

300 hp1988 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2016-2018
VS

Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017

2.0

300 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    285 km/h
    177 mph Unrestricted
    275 km/h
    171 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Lightest
    1,365 kg
    3,009 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    220 hp/t
    164 kW/t
    4.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    158 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    334 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    70/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorsche718 Cayman (982)2.0JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
Power
300hp224kW
300hp224kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,365kg3,009lb
1,525kg3,362lb
Gross weight
1,685kg3,715lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
98.7s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph
Calculated
77.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
5.7s
0-200 km/h
18.1s
19.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
5.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.1s
Calculated
13.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb
Calculated
197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton
Calculated
262Nm/t176lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
783km486mi
Calculated
875km544mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,988cc121cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,379mm172in
4,482mm176in
Width
1,801mm71in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,286mm51in
1,310mm52in
Wheelbase
2,475mm97in
2,622mm103in
Front track
1,515mm60in
1,597mm63in
Rear track
1,532mm60in
1,649mm65in
Trunk volume
334L
310L
Max trunk volume-
408L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
54L
63L
CO2 emissions
158g/km
163g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0PowerTorque
  • Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.06,500 rpm1,950-4,500 rpm7,500 rpm
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.05,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorsche718 Cayman (982)2.0JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
5.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
5.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.1 s
19.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.0 s
11.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.1 s
13.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
173 km/h
108 mph
170 km/h
105 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
300 hp
224 kW
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
300 hp
224 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
1,525 kg
3,362 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.04.9 s
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.05.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
220 hp/t
164 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
197 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
783 km
486 mi
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
875 km
544 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
300 hp
224 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
300 hp
224 kW
5.7 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
334 L
11.8 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,286 mm
50.6 in
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
310 L
10.9 cu ft
Length
4,482 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,310 mm
51.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
4.9 s
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
5.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
220 hp/t
164 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
197 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorsche718 Cayman (982)2.0JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
1,525 kg
3,362 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
334 L
11.8 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,286 mm
50.6 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
310 L
10.9 cu ft
Length
4,482 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,310 mm
51.6 in
Range score
783 km
486 mi
875 km
544 mi
CO2 score
158 g/km
163 g/km
Trunk score
334 L
11.8 cu ft
310 L
10.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
220 hp/t
164 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
197 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km12.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi20.28 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year1,890 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0

  • Is 160 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 24 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 5 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 92 km (57 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0
Jaguar F-type Coupe 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0vsPorsche718 Boxster (982)2.0
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
2.0
4.0
VS
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0vsPorsche718 Spyder (982)4.0
2.0
3.0 V6
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0vsJaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6
2.0
S 3.4
VS
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0vsPorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20172.0
2.0
Carrera 3.0
VS
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0vsPorsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20202.0
2.0
Carrera 4 3.4
VS
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0vsPorsche911 (991)Carrera 4 3.4
2.0
3.0 V6
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0vsJaguarF-type Convertible3.0 V6
2.0
S 3.4
VS
Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0vsPorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
2.0
E 350
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 vs Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster