Jaguar F-type Convertible
Car comparison
Jaguar F-type Convertible SVR 5.0 V8vsRolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRolls-Royce Dawn
6.6 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-type Convertible SVR 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed313 km/h194 mph
- Lightest1,720 kg3,792 lb
- Best power-to-weight334 hp/t249 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.2 L/100 km14.5 mpg US17.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions269 g/km
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score91/100
- Best economy score77/100
Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12
- Most powerful601 hp448 kW
- Highest torque840 Nm620 lb-ft
- Largest trunk321 L
- Best practicality score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8 | Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 575hp429kW | 601hp448kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 840Nm620lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 2,560kg5,644lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | - |
| Top speed | 313 km/h 194 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.9s99% target: 310 km/h / 193 mph Calculated | 73.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.5s Calculated | 18.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | 22.9L/100 km10.3mpg US12.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.4s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 334hp/t249kW/t152hp/1000 lb Calculated | 235hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 407Nm/t272lb-ft/ton Calculated | 328Nm/t220lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 619km385mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 6,592cc402cu in |
| Length | 4,475mm176in | 5,285mm208in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,947mm77in |
| Height | 1,308mm51in | 1,502mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,622mm103in | 3,112mm123in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,618mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,611mm63in | 1,665mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 207L | 321L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 269g/km | 337g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-type Convertible SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 5,250-6,000 rpm | 1,650-4,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8 | Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.5 s | 18.6 s |
| Top speed | 313 km/h 194 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.4 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 209 km/h 130 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 601 hp 448 kW |
Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12 has 26 hp more than Jaguar F-type Convertible SVR 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-type Convertible SVR 5.0 V8 and Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 840 Nm 620 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 2,560 kg 5,644 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8 | 313 km/h 194 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8 | 3.7 s |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 4.9 s |
Although Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12 has more power, Jaguar F-type Convertible SVR 5.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-type Convertible SVR 5.0 V8 and Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-type Convertible SVR 5.0 V8 and Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: 3.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8 | 334 hp/t 249 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW | 3.7 s | 313 km/h 194 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 601 hp 448 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-type Convertible SVR 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8 | 334 hp/t 249 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8 | Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 575 hp 429 kW | 601 hp 448 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 840 Nm 620 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 313 km/h 194 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 2,560 kg 5,644 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 619 km 385 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 269 g/km | 337 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 207 L 7.3 cu ft | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 334 hp/t 249 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-type Convertible SVR 5.0 V8 | Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km | 25.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year | 3,859 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-type Convertible SVR 5.0 V8
- Is 840 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 53 km/h (33 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 100 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 68 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Has 114 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























