Jaguar F-type Convertible
Car comparison
Jaguar F-type Convertible S 3.0 V6vsMorgan Plus 8 4.8 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMorgan Plus 8
4.8 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-type Convertible S 3.0 V6
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Most powerful380 hp283 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions203 g/km
- Best estimated range814 km506 mi
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score84/100
Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Highest torque490 Nm361 lb-ft
- Lightest1,220 kg2,690 lb
- Best power-to-weight301 hp/t224 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score34/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-type ConvertibleS 3.0 V6 | MorganPlus 84.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 380hp283kW | 367hp274kW |
| Torque | 460Nm339lb-ft | 490Nm361lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,614kg3,558lb | 1,220kg2,690lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.7s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 45.2s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.8s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 235hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 301hp/t224kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated | 402Nm/t269lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 814km506mi Calculated | 455km282mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 4,799cc293cu in |
| Length | 4,470mm176in | 4,010mm158in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,751mm69in |
| Height | 1,308mm51in | 1,220mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,622mm103in | - |
| Front track | 1,597mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,649mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | 108mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 196L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 203g/km | 282g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-type Convertible S 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleS 3.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 6,300 rpm | - | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-type ConvertibleS 3.0 V6 | MorganPlus 84.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.8 s | 15.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleS 3.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW |
Jaguar F-type Convertible S 3.0 V6 has 13 hp more than Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8 and Jaguar F-type Convertible S 3.0 V6: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleS 3.0 V6 | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleS 3.0 V6 | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleS 3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleS 3.0 V6 | 4.9 s |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 4.5 s |
Although Jaguar F-type Convertible S 3.0 V6 has more power, Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8 and Jaguar F-type Convertible S 3.0 V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleS 3.0 V6 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-type Convertible S 3.0 V6 and Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8: 3.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleS 3.0 V6 | 235 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleS 3.0 V6 | 814 km 506 mi |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 455 km 282 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleS 3.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW | 4.5 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleS 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleS 3.0 V6 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-type Convertible S 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleS 3.0 V6 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleS 3.0 V6 | 235 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-type ConvertibleS 3.0 V6 | MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 380 hp 283 kW | 367 hp 274 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 814 km 506 mi | 455 km 282 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 203 g/km | 282 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 196 L 6.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 235 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-type Convertible S 3.0 V6 | Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-type Convertible S 3.0 V6
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 36 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 359 km (223 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 79 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 394 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 65 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























