Jaguar F-type Convertible · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar F-type Convertible · Facelift 2020 5.0 V8vsPorsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 718 Boxster (982)
S 2.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Largest trunk233 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best practicality score33/100
Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5
- Lightest1,355 kg2,987 lb
- Best power-to-weight258 hp/t193 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions218 g/km
- Best estimated range667 km414 mi
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 350hp261kW |
| Torque | 580Nm428lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,763kg3,887lb | 1,355kg2,987lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,665kg3,671lb |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.0s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 71.7s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.7s Calculated | 15.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 258hp/t193kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 329Nm/t220lb-ft/ton Calculated | 310Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 636km395mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 2,497cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,470mm176in | 4,379mm172in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,307mm51in | 1,280mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,622mm103in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,628mm64in | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 233L | 125L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 252g/km | 218g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 6,500 rpm | 2,100-4,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.7 s | 15.2 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 116 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW |
Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 has 100 hp more than Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5 and Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: 100 hp (75 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 1,763 kg 3,887 lb |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 4.6 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5 and Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 636 km 395 mi |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.6 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.6 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 350 hp 261 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,763 kg 3,887 lb | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 636 km 395 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 252 g/km | 218 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 233 L 8.2 cu ft | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 | Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
- Has 100 hp more
- Has 160 Nm more
- Has 108 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5
- Is 408 kg lighter
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 30 km (19 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 34 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























