Porsche 718 Spyder (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0vsJaguar F-type Convertible · Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-type Convertible · Facelift 2020
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range660 km410 mi
- Largest trunk233 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best practicality score33/100
Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed301 km/h187 mph
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight296 hp/t221 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420hp313kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | - |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.1s99% target: 298 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 63.6s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.8s | 14.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 296hp/t221kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated | 271hp/t202kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated | 349Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 587km365mi Calculated | 660km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,995cc244cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,430mm174in | 4,470mm176in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,258mm50in | 1,307mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,484mm98in | 2,622mm103in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,534mm60in | 1,628mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 150L | 233L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 244g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 7,600 rpm | 5,000-6,800 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.8 s | 14.4 s |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 420 hp 313 kW |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 has 30 hp more than Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0 and Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 4.4 s |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
Although Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 has more power, Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0 and Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 587 km 365 mi |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 660 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.4 s | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.6 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp 313 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 587 km 365 mi | 660 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 244 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 150 L 5.3 cu ft | 233 L 8.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0 | Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0
- Is 240 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 160 Nm more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 73 km (45 mi) more estimated range
- Has 83 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























