Porsche Macan I (95B)
Car comparison
Porsche Macan I (95B) GTS 3.0 V6vsJaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
3.0t V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Macan I (95B) GTS 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed256 km/h159 mph
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight190 hp/t142 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range739 km459 mi
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score69/100
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
- Lightest1,820 kg4,012 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions209 g/km
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheMacan I (95B)GTS 3.0 V6 | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360hp268kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Gross weight | 2,550kg5,622lb | 2,500kg5,512lb |
| Top speed | 256 km/h 159 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.4s99% target: 253 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 73.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.9s Calculated | 21.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 190hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 739km459mi Calculated | 708km440mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,997cc183cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,692mm185in | 4,731mm186in |
| Width | 1,926mm76in | 2,070mm81in |
| Height | 1,609mm63in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,650mm65in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,658mm65in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 215g/km | 209g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Macan I (95B) GTS 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)GTS 3.0 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 1,650-4,000 rpm | 6,700 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheMacan I (95B)GTS 3.0 V6 | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.9 s | 21.8 s |
| Top speed | 256 km/h 159 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 107 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)GTS 3.0 V6 | 360 hp 268 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Porsche Macan I (95B) GTS 3.0 V6 has 20 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 and Porsche Macan I (95B) GTS 3.0 V6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)GTS 3.0 V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)GTS 3.0 V6 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)GTS 3.0 V6 | 256 km/h 159 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)GTS 3.0 V6 | 5.2 s |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) GTS 3.0 V6 and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)GTS 3.0 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)GTS 3.0 V6 | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)GTS 3.0 V6 | 739 km 459 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 708 km 440 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)GTS 3.0 V6 | 360 hp 268 kW | 5.2 s | 256 km/h 159 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)GTS 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)GTS 3.0 V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Macan I (95B) GTS 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)GTS 3.0 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)GTS 3.0 V6 | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheMacan I (95B)GTS 3.0 V6 | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp 268 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 256 km/h 159 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 739 km 459 mi | 708 km 440 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 215 g/km | 209 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Macan I (95B) GTS 3.0 V6 | Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Macan I (95B) GTS 3.0 V6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 31 km (19 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























