Jaguar F-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport II
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest1,820 kg4,012 lb
- Best power-to-weight187 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions209 g/km
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,221 km759 mi
- Best economy score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 339hp253kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 2,398kg5,287lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | - |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 99.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.5s Calculated | 32.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 708km440mi Calculated | 1,221km759mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 4,367cc266cu in |
| Length | 4,731mm186in | 4,850mm191in |
| Width | - | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,780mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,923mm115in |
| Front track | 1,641mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,654mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 650L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 105L |
| CO2 emissions | 209g/km | 229g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | - | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.5 s | 32.8 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 has 1 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 2,398 kg 5,287 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 5.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 708 km 440 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 1,221 km 759 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 339 hp 253 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb | 2,398 kg 5,287 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 708 km 440 mi | 1,221 km 759 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 209 g/km | 229 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 578 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 20 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8
- Has 250 Nm more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 513 km (319 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























