Car comparison

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-Pace

3.0t V6

340 hp2995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2016-2017
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II

4.4 V8

339 hp4367 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2014-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph
  • Most powerful
    340 hp
    254 kW
  • Lightest
    1,820 kg
    4,012 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    187 hp/t
    139 kW/t
    5.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    209 g/km
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8

  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,221 km
    759 mi
  • Best economy score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-Pace3.0t V6Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Power
340hp254kW
339hp253kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
1,820kg4,012lb
2,398kg5,287lb
Gross weight
2,500kg5,512lb
-
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
71.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
99.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
21.5s
Calculated
32.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.9s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
708km440mi
Calculated
1,221km759mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,995cc183cu in
4,367cc266cu in
Length
4,731mm186in
4,850mm191in
Width-
1,983mm78in
Height
1,652mm65in
1,780mm70in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,923mm115in
Front track
1,641mm65in
-
Rear track
1,654mm65in
-
Ground clearance
213mm8in
-
Trunk volume
650L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
63L
105L
CO2 emissions
209g/km
229g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V66,500 rpm4,500 rpm6,750 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8-1,750-3,500 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-Pace3.0t V6Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.5 s
32.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.9 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
167 km/h
104 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
340 hp
254 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 has 1 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
1,820 kg
4,012 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
2,398 kg
5,287 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
250 km/h
155 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V65.8 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V86.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
187 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
708 km
440 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
1,221 km
759 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
340 hp
254 kW
5.8 s
250 km/h
155 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
5.8 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
187 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-Pace3.0t V6Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Power
340 hp
254 kW
339 hp
253 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
6.9 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
1,820 kg
4,012 lb
2,398 kg
5,287 lb
Fuel consumption
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Range score
708 km
440 mi
1,221 km
759 mi
CO2 score
209 g/km
229 g/km
Trunk score
650 L
23.0 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
187 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8
Consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.58 LC100 km15.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.07 LC100 mi24.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,336 LC/year2,258 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 578 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 20 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8

  • Has 250 Nm more
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 513 km (319 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster