Car comparison

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-Pace

3.0t V6

340 hp2995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2016-2017
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017

4.4 V8

339 hp4367 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph
  • Most powerful
    340 hp
    254 kW
  • Lightest
    1,820 kg
    4,012 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    187 hp/t
    139 kW/t
    5.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8

  • Highest torque
    740 Nm
    546 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.8 L/100 km
    21.8 mpg US
    26.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    182 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,024 km
    636 mi
  • Largest trunk
    900 L
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-Pace3.0t V6Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
Power
340hp254kW
339hp253kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
740Nm546lb-ft
Curb weight
1,820kg4,012lb
2,592kg5,714lb
Gross weight
2,500kg5,512lb
-
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
73.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
107.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
21.8s
Calculated
37.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.9s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb
Calculated
131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
708km440mi
Calculated
1,024km636mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,995cc183cu in
4,367cc266cu in
Length
4,731mm186in
5,200mm205in
Width
2,070mm81in
2,073mm82in
Height
1,652mm65in
1,868mm74in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
3,120mm123in
Front track
1,641mm65in
1,693mm67in
Rear track
1,654mm65in
1,685mm66in
Ground clearance
213mm8in
220mm9in
Trunk volume
650L
900L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
63L
86L
CO2 emissions
209g/km
182g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-Pace3.0t V6Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.8 s
37.5 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.9 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
340 hp
254 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 has 1 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
740 Nm
546 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
1,820 kg
4,012 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
2,592 kg
5,714 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
250 km/h
155 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8: 1.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
187 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
708 km
440 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
1,024 km
636 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
340 hp
254 kW
5.8 s
250 km/h
155 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW
7.2 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Length
5,200 mm
204.7 in
Height
1,868 mm
73.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
5.8 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
187 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-Pace3.0t V6Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
Power
340 hp
254 kW
339 hp
253 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
740 Nm
546 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
7.2 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
1,820 kg
4,012 lb
2,592 kg
5,714 lb
Fuel consumption
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Length
5,200 mm
204.7 in
Height
1,868 mm
73.5 in
Range score
708 km
440 mi
1,024 km
636 mi
CO2 score
209 g/km
182 g/km
Trunk score
650 L
23.0 cu ft
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
187 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8
Consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.58 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.07 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,336 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 772 kg lighter
  • Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 56 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8

  • Has 290 Nm more
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 316 km (196 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 250 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 27 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 vs Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster