Jaguar F-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest1,820 kg4,012 lb
- Best power-to-weight187 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score65/100
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8
- Highest torque740 Nm546 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions182 g/km
- Best estimated range1,024 km636 mi
- Largest trunk900 L
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 339hp253kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 740Nm546lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 2,592kg5,714lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | - |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 107.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.8s Calculated | 37.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 708km440mi Calculated | 1,024km636mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 4,367cc266cu in |
| Length | 4,731mm186in | 5,200mm205in |
| Width | 2,070mm81in | 2,073mm82in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,868mm74in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | 1,641mm65in | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,654mm65in | 1,685mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 220mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 900L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 86L |
| CO2 emissions | 209g/km | 182g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.8 s | 37.5 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 has 1 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 2,592 kg 5,714 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 5.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 708 km 440 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 1,024 km 636 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 339 hp 253 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb | 2,592 kg 5,714 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 708 km 440 mi | 1,024 km 636 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 209 g/km | 182 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 900 L 31.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 772 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 56 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8
- Has 290 Nm more
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 316 km (196 mi) more estimated range
- Has 250 L more trunk volume
- Emits 27 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























