Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDIvsJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,071 km666 mi
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score92/100
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Largest trunk755 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,951kg4,301lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | - |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.0s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 88.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.7s Calculated | 53.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,071km666mi Calculated | 896km556mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,747mm187in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 2,071mm82in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,664mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,656mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 755L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | 1,804L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 147g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.7 s | 53.5 s |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d has 14 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 1,951 kg 4,301 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 8.0 s |
Although Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,071 km 666 mi |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 896 km 556 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.0 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,951 kg 4,301 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,071 km 666 mi | 896 km 556 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 147 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 755 L 26.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI | Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Is 286 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 176 km (109 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























