Jaguar XK Coupe (X150)
Car comparison
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8vsJaguar E-type 2+2 4.2 (Series 1)
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar E-type 2+2
4.2 (Series 1)
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful298 hp222 kW
- Highest torque411 Nm303 lb-ft
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score47/100
Jaguar E-type 2+2 4.2 (Series 1)
- Lightest1,143 kg2,520 lb
- Best power-to-weight232 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | JaguarE-type 2+24.2 (Series 1) |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 298hp222kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 411Nm303lb-ft | 384Nm283lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,143kg2,520lb |
| Gross weight | 2,035kg4,486lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 86.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 80.0s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.7s Calculated | 24.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 336Nm/t225lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 629km391mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,196cc256cu in | 4,235cc258cu in |
| Length | 4,791mm189in | 4,680mm184in |
| Width | 1,892mm74in | 1,680mm66in |
| Height | 1,322mm52in | 1,270mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,752mm108in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,280mm50in |
| Rear track | - | 1,280mm50in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 220L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar E-type 2+2 4.2 (Series 1): Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| JaguarE-type 2+24.2 (Series 1) | 5,400 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | JaguarE-type 2+24.2 (Series 1) |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.7 s | 24.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 298 hp 222 kW |
| JaguarE-type 2+24.2 (Series 1) | 265 hp 198 kW |
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8 has 33 hp more than Jaguar E-type 2+2 4.2 (Series 1).
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar E-type 2+2 4.2 (Series 1) and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8: 33 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft |
| JaguarE-type 2+24.2 (Series 1) | 384 Nm 283 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
| JaguarE-type 2+24.2 (Series 1) | 1,143 kg 2,520 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarE-type 2+24.2 (Series 1) | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 6.2 s |
| JaguarE-type 2+24.2 (Series 1) | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8 and Jaguar E-type 2+2 4.2 (Series 1): 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarE-type 2+24.2 (Series 1) | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 298 hp 222 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarE-type 2+24.2 (Series 1) | 265 hp 198 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarE-type 2+24.2 (Series 1) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | JaguarE-type 2+24.2 (Series 1) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 298 hp 222 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft | 384 Nm 283 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | 1,143 kg 2,520 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 629 km 391 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8
- Has 33 hp more
- Has 27 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Jaguar E-type 2+2 4.2 (Series 1)
- Is 502 kg lighter
- Has 51 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























