Car comparison

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv XvsJaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0i

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
VS

Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020

2.0i

200 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    601 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    44/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Fastest top speed
    204 km/h
    127 mph
  • Lightest
    1,537 kg
    3,389 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    90 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    787 km
    489 mi
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
186hp139kW
200hp149kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,537kg3,389lb
1,772kg3,907lb
Gross weight
2,042kg4,502lb
-
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
79.3s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
84.6s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
66.2s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton
Calculated
181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
787km489mi
Calculated
691km429mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,795mm71in
1,984mm78in
Height
1,540mm61in
1,648mm65in
Wheelbase
2,655mm105in
2,681mm106in
Front track
1,565mm62in
1,625mm64in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,624mm64in
Ground clearance
180mm7in
212mm8in
Trunk volume
430L
601L
Max trunk volume
1,406L
1,386L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
48L
67L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv XJaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0iPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i5,500 rpm1,200-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
66.2 s
-
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
200 hp
149 kW

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i has 14 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
1,537 kg
3,389 lb
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
1,772 kg
3,907 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
204 km/h
127 mph
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
200 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X8.8 s
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i8.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 3.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
787 km
489 mi
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
691 km
429 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW
8.8 s
204 km/h
127 mph
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
200 hp
149 kW
8.5 s
200 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
601 L
21.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,648 mm
64.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
8.8 s
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
186 hp
139 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.5 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
1,537 kg
3,389 lb
1,772 kg
3,907 lb
Fuel consumption
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
601 L
21.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,648 mm
64.9 in
Range score
787 km
489 mi
691 km
429 mi
Trunk score
430 L
15.2 cu ft
601 L
21.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv XJaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
Consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.67 LC100 km16.97 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.18 LC100 mi27.32 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used915 L242 US gal201 UK gal1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,601 LC/year2,546 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Is 235 kg lighter
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 96 km (60 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 171 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0i
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 e-Skyactiv X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0i
2.0 P200
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
2.0i
2.0d
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0i
20d
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsJaguarF-Pace20d
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
2.0i
2.2 CRDi
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
350h
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
2.0i
2.5
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsToyotaRAV4 V2.5
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
330TSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.0i
2.0 TDI
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X vs Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0i - car comparison - FastVsFaster