Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020 3.0 D300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020
3.0 D300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 D300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range957 km594 mi
- Largest trunk748 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,877 kg4,138 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,877kg4,138lb | 2,049kg4,517lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.8s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.2s Calculated | 30.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 691km429mi Calculated | 957km594mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 2,041mm80in |
| Height | 1,648mm65in | 1,683mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,625mm64in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,624mm64in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 601L | 748L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,386L | 1,811L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 D300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 D300 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.2 s | 30.1 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 D300 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 D300 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 1,877 kg 4,138 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 D300 | 2,049 kg 4,517 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 D300 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 6.9 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 D300 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 D300 and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 D300 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 D300 and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 D300 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 691 km 429 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 D300 | 957 km 594 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.9 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 D300 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 D300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 D300 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 D300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 D300 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 D300 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 D300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,877 kg 4,138 lb | 2,049 kg 4,517 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 691 km 429 mi | 957 km 594 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 601 L 21.2 cu ft | 748 L 26.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i | Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Is 172 kg lighter
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 D300
- Has 250 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 266 km (165 mi) more estimated range
- Has 147 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























