Infiniti Q70
Car comparison
Infiniti Q70 3.0D V6vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Infiniti Q70 3.0D V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,067 km663 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score87/100
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Lightest1,735 kg3,825 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ703.0D V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 238hp177kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,845kg4,068lb | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Gross weight | 2,395kg5,280lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.2s Calculated | 28.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 298Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,067km663mi Calculated | 952km592mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,945mm195in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,845mm73in | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,500mm59in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,900mm114in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 450L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 199g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q70 3.0D V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ703.0D V6 | 3,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ703.0D V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.2 s | 28.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ703.0D V6 | 238 hp 177 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 has 2 hp more than Infiniti Q70 3.0D V6.
The biggest power difference is between Infiniti Q70 3.0D V6 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ703.0D V6 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ703.0D V6 | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ703.0D V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ703.0D V6 | 6.9 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 7.9 s |
Although Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 has more power, Infiniti Q70 3.0D V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti Q70 3.0D V6 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ703.0D V6 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Infiniti Q70 3.0D V6 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ703.0D V6 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ703.0D V6 | 1,067 km 663 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 952 km 592 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ703.0D V6 | 238 hp 177 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ703.0D V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ703.0D V6 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti Q70 3.0D V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ703.0D V6 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ703.0D V6 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ703.0D V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 238 hp 177 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,067 km 663 mi | 952 km 592 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 199 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q70 3.0D V6 | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q70 3.0D V6
- Has 210 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 114 km (71 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























