Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 S 3.0tvsJaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
S 3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful405 hp302 kW
- Highest torque475 Nm350 lb-ft
- Lightest1,744 kg3,845 lb
- Best power-to-weight232 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range879 km546 mi
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score74/100
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions204 g/km
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 405hp302kW | 380hp283kW |
| Torque | 475Nm350lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,744kg3,845lb | 1,760kg3,880lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 47.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 51.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.9s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 216hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 879km546mi Calculated | 860km535mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,997cc183cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,810mm189in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 505L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 206g/km | 204g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t | 6,400 rpm | 1,600-5,200 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.9 s | 15.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t | 405 hp 302 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW |
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t has 25 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t | 5.1 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t and Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t | 879 km 546 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 860 km 535 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t | 405 hp 302 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ50Facelift 2017S 3.0t | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 405 hp 302 kW | 380 hp 283 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 879 km 546 mi | 860 km 535 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 206 g/km | 204 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t | Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 S 3.0t
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Is 16 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 19 km (12 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























