Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 3.5vsVolkswagen Phideon 480V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Phideon
480V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Lightest1,861 kg4,103 lb
- Best power-to-weight164 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,029 km640 mi
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score89/100
Volkswagen Phideon 480V6
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Best overall score68/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | VolkswagenPhideon480V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 299hp223kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,861kg4,103lb | 2,025kg4,464lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 67.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.5s Calculated | 20.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 164hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,029km640mi Calculated | 824km512mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,810mm189in | 5,074mm200in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,893mm75in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,463mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 3,009mm118in |
| Trunk volume | 400L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Phideon 480V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 6,800 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| VolkswagenPhideon480V6 | 5,250-6,500 rpm | 2,900-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | VolkswagenPhideon480V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.5 s | 20.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 306 hp 228 kW |
| VolkswagenPhideon480V6 | 299 hp 223 kW |
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 has 7 hp more than Volkswagen Phideon 480V6.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Phideon 480V6 and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPhideon480V6 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 1,861 kg 4,103 lb |
| VolkswagenPhideon480V6 | 2,025 kg 4,464 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenPhideon480V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 5.4 s |
| VolkswagenPhideon480V6 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 and Volkswagen Phideon 480V6: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPhideon480V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 and Volkswagen Phideon 480V6: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPhideon480V6 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 1,029 km 640 mi |
| VolkswagenPhideon480V6 | 824 km 512 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenPhideon480V6 | 299 hp 223 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPhideon480V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenPhideon480V6 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| VolkswagenPhideon480V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPhideon480V6 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | VolkswagenPhideon480V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 299 hp 223 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,861 kg 4,103 lb | 2,025 kg 4,464 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,029 km 640 mi | 824 km 512 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 | Volkswagen Phideon 480V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 164 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 205 km (128 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Volkswagen Phideon 480V6
- Has 90 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























