Mini Paceman (R61)
Car comparison
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6vsHyundai Veloster · Facelift 2015 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHyundai Veloster · Facelift 2015
1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Hyundai Veloster Facelift 2015 1.6
- Highest torque265 Nm195 lb-ft
- Lightest1,313 kg2,895 lb
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions157 g/km
- Best estimated range725 km450 mi
- Best overall score52/100
- Best practicality score64/100
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Largest trunk330 L
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 186hp139kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,313kg2,895lb |
| Gross weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.6s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 81.7s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 45.4s Calculated | 44.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 662km411mi Calculated | 725km450mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,591cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,114mm162in | 4,250mm167in |
| Width | 1,786mm70in | 1,805mm71in |
| Height | 1,518mm60in | 1,405mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,531mm60in | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,570mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 149mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 330L | 320L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,080L | 1,015L |
| Doors | 3 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 165g/km | 157g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
- Hyundai Veloster Facelift 2015 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 45.4 s | 44.9 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6 | 186 hp 139 kW |
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has 4 hp more than Hyundai Veloster Facelift 2015 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Hyundai Veloster Facelift 2015 1.6 and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6 | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6 | 1,313 kg 2,895 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6 | 214 km/h 133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 8.0 s |
| HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 and Hyundai Veloster Facelift 2015 1.6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 662 km 411 mi |
| HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6 | 725 km 450 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6 | 186 hp 139 kW | 8.4 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | HyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 186 hp 139 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,313 kg 2,895 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 662 km 411 mi | 725 km 450 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 165 g/km | 157 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | 320 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 | Hyundai Veloster Facelift 2015 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Hyundai Veloster Facelift 2015 1.6
- Has 25 Nm more
- Is 92 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 63 km (39 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























