Car comparison

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDIvsNissan Qashqai III (J12) · Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Hyundai Kona II

1.6 T-GDI

170 hp1598 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-2025
VS

Nissan Qashqai III (J12) · Facelift 2024

1.3 DIG-T

158 hp1332 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T

  • Highest torque
    270 Nm
    199 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,510 kg
    3,329 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    859 km
    534 mi
  • Largest trunk
    504 L
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    201 km/h
    125 mph
  • Most powerful
    170 hp
    127 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    108 hp/t
    80 kW/t
    9.3 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    42/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDINissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
Power
170hp127kW
158hp118kW
Torque
265Nm195lb-ft
270Nm199lb-ft
Curb weight
1,575kg3,472lb
1,510kg3,329lb
Gross weight
2,000kg4,409lb
1,985kg4,376lb
Top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
199 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
81.6s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph
Calculated
86.5s99% target: 197 km/h / 122 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
9.2s
0-200 km/h
96.3s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
168Nm/t113lb-ft/ton
Calculated
179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
662km411mi
Calculated
859km534mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
1,332cc81cu in
Length
4,350mm171in
4,425mm174in
Width
1,825mm72in
1,835mm72in
Height
1,585mm62in
1,625mm64in
Wheelbase
2,660mm105in
2,665mm105in
Front track
1,591mm63in
1,590mm63in
Rear track
1,600mm63in
1,596mm63in
Ground clearance
170mm7in
-
Trunk volume
466L
504L
Max trunk volume
1,300L
1,447L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
47L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDINissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-TPowerTorque
  • Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: Power / Torque
  • Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI6,000 rpm1,600-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T5,500 rpm1,800-3,750 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDINissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
9.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
96.3 s
-
Top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
199 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
136 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
170 hp
127 kW
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
158 hp
118 kW

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI has 12 hp more than Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T and Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: 12 hp (9 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
270 Nm
199 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
1,575 kg
3,472 lb
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
1,510 kg
3,329 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
201 km/h
125 mph
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
199 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI8.8 s
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T9.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI and Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T and Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
108 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
662 km
411 mi
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
859 km
534 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
170 hp
127 kW
8.8 s
201 km/h
125 mph
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
158 hp
118 kW
9.2 s
199 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
466 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
Power
158 hp
118 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
199 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
504 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
Power
158 hp
118 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
199 km/h
124 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
8.8 s
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
9.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
108 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDINissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
Power
170 hp
127 kW
158 hp
118 kW
Torque
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
9.2 s
Top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
199 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
1,575 kg
3,472 lb
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
Fuel consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
466 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
504 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in
Range score
662 km
411 mi
859 km
534 mi
Trunk score
466 L
16.5 cu ft
504 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
108 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleHyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDINissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T
Consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.42 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.00 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,864 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI

  • Has 12 hp more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T

  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Is 65 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 197 km (123 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 38 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 T-GDI
2.2 CRDi
VS
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIvsHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
1.3 DIG-T
1.3 DIG-T
VS
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-TvsNissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
1.6 T-GDI
1.5 VGT
VS
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIvsAlfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT
1.3 DIG-T
1.3 TCe
VS
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-TvsRenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe
1.6 T-GDI
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIvsFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1.3 DIG-T
1.5 eTSI
VS
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-TvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI
1.6 T-GDI
1.5 VGT
VS
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIvsAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
1.3 DIG-T
GLB 200d
VS
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-TvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
1.6 T-GDI
GLA 200
VS
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200
1.3 DIG-T
1.4 TSI
VS
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-TvsVolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
1.3 DIG-T
35 TFSI
VS
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-TvsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
1.6 T-GDI
1.3 Turbo
VS
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIvsMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI vs Nissan Qashqai III (J12) · Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T - car comparison - FastVsFaster