Lexus LS III · Facelift 2004
Car comparison
Lexus LS III · Facelift 2004 430 V8vsHyundai Centennial 4.5 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHyundai Centennial
4.5 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful282 hp210 kW
- Highest torque417 Nm308 lb-ft
- Lightest1,835 kg4,045 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.3 L/100 km14.4 mpg US17.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 282hp210kW | 270hp201kW |
| Torque | 417Nm308lb-ft | 381Nm281lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Gross weight | 2,340kg5,159lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 87.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.2s Calculated | 29.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.3L/100 km14.4mpg US17.3mpg UK | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 737km458mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,293cc262cu in | 4,498cc274cu in |
| Length | 5,025mm198in | 5,065mm199in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,925mm115in | 2,830mm111in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,615mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 84L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 270g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8: Power / Torque
- Hyundai Centennial 4.5 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | 5,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.2 s | 29.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 282 hp 210 kW |
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | 270 hp 201 kW |
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 has 12 hp more than Hyundai Centennial 4.5 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Hyundai Centennial 4.5 V8 and Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 417 Nm 308 lb-ft |
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | 381 Nm 281 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | 1,990 kg 4,387 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 6.3 s |
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 and Hyundai Centennial 4.5 V8: 2.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 282 hp 210 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | 270 hp 201 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 282 hp 210 kW | 270 hp 201 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 417 Nm 308 lb-ft | 381 Nm 281 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | 1,990 kg 4,387 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 737 km 458 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 270 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 36 Nm more
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Is 2.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Hyundai Centennial 4.5 V8
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























