HSV Clubsport (VZ)
Car comparison
HSV Clubsport (VZ) R8 6.0 V8vsMaserati Quattroporte V 4.2 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Quattroporte V
4.2 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
HSV Clubsport (VZ) R8 6.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful404 hp301 kW
- Highest torque530 Nm391 lb-ft
- Lightest1,662 kg3,664 lb
- Best power-to-weight243 hp/t181 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk465 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score76/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Maserati Quattroporte V 4.2 i V8 32V
- Best economy score67/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HSVClubsport (VZ)R8 6.0 V8 | MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 404hp301kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 530Nm391lb-ft | 460Nm339lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,662kg3,664lb | 1,880kg4,145lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.8s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 60.6s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 22L/100 km10.7mpg US12.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated | 213hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 319Nm/t213lb-ft/ton Calculated | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 611km380mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,967cc364cu in | 4,244cc259cu in |
| Length | 4,891mm193in | 5,097mm201in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,885mm74in |
| Height | 1,404mm55in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,789mm110in | 3,064mm121in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,582mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,577mm62in | 1,595mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 465L | 450L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- HSV Clubsport (VZ) R8 6.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Maserati Quattroporte V 4.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VZ)R8 6.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HSVClubsport (VZ)R8 6.0 V8 | MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.6 s | 15.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 117 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VZ)R8 6.0 V8 | 404 hp 301 kW |
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 400 hp 298 kW |
HSV Clubsport (VZ) R8 6.0 V8 has 4 hp more than Maserati Quattroporte V 4.2 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Quattroporte V 4.2 i V8 32V and HSV Clubsport (VZ) R8 6.0 V8: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VZ)R8 6.0 V8 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VZ)R8 6.0 V8 | 1,662 kg 3,664 lb |
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VZ)R8 6.0 V8 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VZ)R8 6.0 V8 | 5.3 s |
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 5.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between HSV Clubsport (VZ) R8 6.0 V8 and Maserati Quattroporte V 4.2 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VZ)R8 6.0 V8 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VZ)R8 6.0 V8 | 404 hp 301 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VZ)R8 6.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HSVClubsport (VZ)R8 6.0 V8 | MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 404 hp 301 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,662 kg 3,664 lb | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 611 km 380 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 465 L 16.4 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte V 4.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.48 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,210 L584 US gal486 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,867 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
HSV Clubsport (VZ) R8 6.0 V8
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 218 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Maserati Quattroporte V 4.2 i V8 32V
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























