Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) · Facelift 1999
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) · Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8vsHSV Clubsport (VT) R8 5.7 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHSV Clubsport (VT)
R8 5.7 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful354 hp264 kW
- Highest torque530 Nm391 lb-ft
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score77/100
HSV Clubsport (VT) R8 5.7 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Lightest1,678 kg3,699 lb
- Best power-to-weight203 hp/t151 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 354hp264kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 530Nm391lb-ft | 473Nm349lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,678kg3,699lb |
| Gross weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 55.7s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.6s Calculated | 17.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated | 203hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 640km398mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,439cc332cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 4,818mm190in | 4,919mm194in |
| Width | 1,799mm71in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,411mm56in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,833mm112in | 2,788mm110in |
| Front track | 1,560mm61in | 1,558mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,543mm61in | 1,574mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 475L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8: Power / Torque
- HSV Clubsport (VT) R8 5.7 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.6 s | 17.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 354 hp 264 kW |
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8 has 14 hp more than HSV Clubsport (VT) R8 5.7 V8.
The biggest power difference is between HSV Clubsport (VT) R8 5.7 V8 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | 473 Nm 349 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | 1,678 kg 3,699 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | 262 km/h 163 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 5.9 s |
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | 5.5 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8 has more power, HSV Clubsport (VT) R8 5.7 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between HSV Clubsport (VT) R8 5.7 V8 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.5 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 354 hp 264 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | 473 Nm 349 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,678 kg 3,699 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 640 km 398 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 57 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
HSV Clubsport (VT) R8 5.7 V8
- Is 92 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























