Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8vsHSV Clubsport (VT) R8 5.7 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHSV Clubsport (VT)
R8 5.7 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful347 hp259 kW
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 347hp259kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 510Nm376lb-ft | 473Nm349lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,678kg3,699lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 53.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 55.7s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.3s Calculated | 17.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 203hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 530km329mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,439cc332cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 4,516mm178in | 4,919mm194in |
| Width | 1,723mm68in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,387mm55in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,788mm110in |
| Front track | 1,509mm59in | 1,558mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,483mm58in | 1,574mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 475L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8: Power / Torque
- HSV Clubsport (VT) R8 5.7 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.3 s | 17.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW |
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 has 7 hp more than HSV Clubsport (VT) R8 5.7 V8.
The biggest power difference is between HSV Clubsport (VT) R8 5.7 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | 473 Nm 349 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | 1,678 kg 3,699 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | 262 km/h 163 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 5.5 s |
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.5 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | HSVClubsport (VT)R8 5.7 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 347 hp 259 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | 473 Nm 349 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,678 kg 3,699 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 530 km 329 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 37 Nm more
- Is 108 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
HSV Clubsport (VT) R8 5.7 V8
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























