Mercedes-Benz M-class (W164)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz M-class (W164) ML 500 V8vsHSV Avalanche 5.7 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHSV Avalanche
5.7 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz M-class (W164) ML 500 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful388 hp289 kW
- Highest torque530 Nm391 lb-ft
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score68/100
HSV Avalanche 5.7 V8
- Lightest2,026 kg4,467 lb
- Best power-to-weight181 hp/t135 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,210 km752 mi
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzM-class (W164)ML 500 V8 | HSVAvalanche5.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 388hp289kW | 367hp274kW |
| Torque | 530Nm391lb-ft | 475Nm350lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,185kg4,817lb | 2,026kg4,467lb |
| Gross weight | 2,830kg6,239lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 82.1s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.6s Calculated | 31.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 178hp/t132kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 725km451mi Calculated | 1,210km752mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,966cc303cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 4,788mm189in | 5,106mm201in |
| Width | 1,911mm75in | 1,942mm76in |
| Height | 1,840mm72in | 1,654mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,915mm115in | 2,947mm116in |
| Front track | 1,627mm64in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,623mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 551L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 2,050L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 95L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 311g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz M-class (W164) ML 500 V8: Power / Torque
- HSV Avalanche 5.7 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W164)ML 500 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| HSVAvalanche5.7 V8 | 5,700 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzM-class (W164)ML 500 V8 | HSVAvalanche5.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.6 s | 31.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W164)ML 500 V8 | 388 hp 289 kW |
| HSVAvalanche5.7 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW |
Mercedes-Benz M-class (W164) ML 500 V8 has 21 hp more than HSV Avalanche 5.7 V8.
The biggest power difference is between HSV Avalanche 5.7 V8 and Mercedes-Benz M-class (W164) ML 500 V8: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W164)ML 500 V8 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
| HSVAvalanche5.7 V8 | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W164)ML 500 V8 | 2,185 kg 4,817 lb |
| HSVAvalanche5.7 V8 | 2,026 kg 4,467 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W164)ML 500 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HSVAvalanche5.7 V8 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W164)ML 500 V8 | 5.8 s |
| HSVAvalanche5.7 V8 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz M-class (W164) ML 500 V8 and HSV Avalanche 5.7 V8: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W164)ML 500 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| HSVAvalanche5.7 V8 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between HSV Avalanche 5.7 V8 and Mercedes-Benz M-class (W164) ML 500 V8: 6.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W164)ML 500 V8 | 178 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| HSVAvalanche5.7 V8 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W164)ML 500 V8 | 725 km 451 mi |
| HSVAvalanche5.7 V8 | 1,210 km 752 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W164)ML 500 V8 | 388 hp 289 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HSVAvalanche5.7 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW | 6.9 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W164)ML 500 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HSVAvalanche5.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W164)ML 500 V8 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| HSVAvalanche5.7 V8 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
HSV Avalanche 5.7 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W164)ML 500 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| HSVAvalanche5.7 V8 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W164)ML 500 V8 | 178 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| HSVAvalanche5.7 V8 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzM-class (W164)ML 500 V8 | HSVAvalanche5.7 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 388 hp 289 kW | 367 hp 274 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,185 kg 4,817 lb | 2,026 kg 4,467 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 725 km 451 mi | 1,210 km 752 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 311 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 551 L 19.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 178 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz M-class (W164) ML 500 V8 | HSV Avalanche 5.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz M-class (W164) ML 500 V8
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 55 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
HSV Avalanche 5.7 V8
- Is 159 kg lighter
- Uses 6.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 484 km (301 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























