Hongqi H9
Car comparison
Hongqi H9 2.0TvsMercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 98 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE (V295)
EQE 300 98 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 98 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Hongqi H9 2.0T
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HongqiH92.0T | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 2,310kg5,093lb |
| Gross weight | 2,325kg5,126lb | 2,880kg6,349lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 64.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.9s Calculated | 29.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 873km543mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,989cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 5,137mm202in | 4,946mm195in |
| Width | 1,904mm75in | 1,961mm77in |
| Height | 1,493mm59in | 1,510mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 3,060mm120in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | 1,633mm64in | 1,632mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,642mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 370L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 895L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HongqiH92.0T | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.9 s | 29.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T | 252 hp 188 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh | 245 hp 183 kW |
Hongqi H9 2.0T has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 98 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 98 kWh and Hongqi H9 2.0T: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T | 7.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh | 7.3 s |
Although Hongqi H9 2.0T has more power, Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 98 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 98 kWh and Hongqi H9 2.0T: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T | 252 hp 188 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HongqiH92.0T | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 873 km 543 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Hongqi H9 2.0T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Hongqi H9 2.0T
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 435 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 300 98 kWh
- Has 170 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























