Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsHongqi H9 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHongqi H9
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight151 hp/t112 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk459 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Hongqi H9 2.0T
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range873 km543 mi
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | HongqiH92.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 252hp188kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,325kg5,126lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 77.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.7s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 831km517mi Calculated | 873km543mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,989cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,962mm195in | 5,137mm202in |
| Width | 1,982mm78in | 1,904mm75in |
| Height | 1,456mm57in | 1,493mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 3,060mm120in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,633mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,629mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 459L | 370L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,484L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
- Hongqi H9 2.0T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| HongqiH92.0T | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | HongqiH92.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.7 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW |
| HongqiH92.0T | 252 hp 188 kW |
Hongqi H9 2.0T has 2 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i and Hongqi H9 2.0T: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| HongqiH92.0T | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| HongqiH92.0T | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HongqiH92.0T | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 6.9 s |
| HongqiH92.0T | 7.8 s |
Although Hongqi H9 2.0T has more power, Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i and Hongqi H9 2.0T: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| HongqiH92.0T | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Hongqi H9 2.0T and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| HongqiH92.0T | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 831 km 517 mi |
| HongqiH92.0T | 873 km 543 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HongqiH92.0T | 252 hp 188 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HongqiH92.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| HongqiH92.0T |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| HongqiH92.0T | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| HongqiH92.0T | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | HongqiH92.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 252 hp 188 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 831 km 517 mi | 873 km 543 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 459 L 16.2 cu ft | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i | Hongqi H9 2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Is 215 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 89 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Hongqi H9 2.0T
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 42 km (26 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























