Hongqi H9
Car comparison
Hongqi H9 2.0T · Stage 3vsHongqi H9 2.0T · Stage 2vsHongqi H9 2.0T · Stage 1vsHongqi H9 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHongqi H9
2.0T (Stage 2)
Hongqi H9
2.0T (Stage 1)
Hongqi H9
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Hongqi H9 2.0T (Stage 3) 378 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed269 km/h167 mph
- Most powerful378 hp282 kW
- Highest torque589 Nm434 lb-ft
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best power-to-weight202 hp/t150 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range873 km543 mi
- Largest trunk370 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score72/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HongqiH92.0T (Stage 3)378 hp | HongqiH92.0T (Stage 2)328 hp | HongqiH92.0T (Stage 1)297 hp | HongqiH92.0T252 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 378hp282kW+126 hp | 328hp244kW+76 hp | 297hp222kW+45 hp | 252hp188kW |
| Torque | 589Nm434lb-ft+209 Nm | 513Nm378lb-ft+133 Nm | 464Nm342lb-ft+84 Nm | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 1,875kg4,134lb | 1,875kg4,134lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Gross weight | 2,325kg5,126lb | 2,325kg5,126lb | 2,325kg5,126lb | 2,325kg5,126lb |
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.3s99% target: 266 km/h / 165 mph-15.8 s Calculated | 66.0s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph-11.0 s Calculated | 69.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-7.8 s Calculated | 77.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s-1.8 s | 6.6s-1.2 s | 7.0s-0.8 s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s-9.0 s Calculated | 20.8s-6.1 s Calculated | 23.0s-3.8 s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s-1.6 s Calculated | 6.3s-1.1 s Calculated | 6.7s-0.7 s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s-1.6 s Calculated | 14.5s-1.1 s Calculated | 14.9s-0.7 s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 202hp/t150kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated | 175hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 314Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 873km543mi Calculated | 873km543mi Calculated | 873km543mi Calculated | 873km543mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,989cc121cu in | 1,989cc121cu in | 1,989cc121cu in | 1,989cc121cu in |
| Length | 5,137mm202in | 5,137mm202in | 5,137mm202in | 5,137mm202in |
| Width | 1,904mm75in | 1,904mm75in | 1,904mm75in | 1,904mm75in |
| Height | 1,493mm59in | 1,493mm59in | 1,493mm59in | 1,493mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 3,060mm120in | 3,060mm120in | 3,060mm120in | 3,060mm120in |
| Front track | 1,633mm64in | 1,633mm64in | 1,633mm64in | 1,633mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,629mm64in | 1,629mm64in | 1,629mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 370L | 370L | 370L | 370L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 62L | 62L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Hongqi H9 2.0T (Stage 3) 378 hp: Power / Torque
- Hongqi H9 2.0T (Stage 2) 328 hp: Power / Torque
- Hongqi H9 2.0T (Stage 1) 297 hp: Power / Torque
- Hongqi H9 2.0T 252 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 3)378 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 2)328 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 1)297 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| HongqiH92.0T252 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HongqiH92.0T (Stage 3)378 hp | HongqiH92.0T (Stage 2)328 hp | HongqiH92.0T (Stage 1)297 hp | HongqiH92.0T252 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.3 s | 6.7 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.6 s | 7.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 20.8 s | 23.0 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.7 s | 10.0 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.3 s | 12.7 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.5 s | 14.9 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 3)378 hp | 378 hp 282 kW |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 2)328 hp | 328 hp 244 kW |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 1)297 hp | 297 hp 222 kW |
| HongqiH92.0T252 hp | 252 hp 188 kW |
Hongqi H9 2.0T (Stage 3) 378 hp has 126 hp more than Hongqi H9 2.0T 252 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Hongqi H9 2.0T 252 hp and Hongqi H9 2.0T (Stage 3) 378 hp: 126 hp (94 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 3)378 hp | 589 Nm 434 lb-ft |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 2)328 hp | 513 Nm 378 lb-ft |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 1)297 hp | 464 Nm 342 lb-ft |
| HongqiH92.0T252 hp | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 3)378 hp | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 2)328 hp | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 1)297 hp | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
| HongqiH92.0T252 hp | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 3)378 hp | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 2)328 hp | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 1)297 hp | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| HongqiH92.0T252 hp | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 3)378 hp | 6.1 s |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 2)328 hp | 6.6 s |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 1)297 hp | 7.0 s |
| HongqiH92.0T252 hp | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Hongqi H9 2.0T (Stage 3) 378 hp and Hongqi H9 2.0T 252 hp: 1.8 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Hongqi H9 2.0T (Stage 2) 328 hp and Hongqi H9 2.0T (Stage 1) 297 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 3)378 hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 2)328 hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 1)297 hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| HongqiH92.0T252 hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 3)378 hp | 202 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 2)328 hp | 175 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 1)297 hp | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| HongqiH92.0T252 hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 3)378 hp | 873 km 543 mi |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 2)328 hp | 873 km 543 mi |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 1)297 hp | 873 km 543 mi |
| HongqiH92.0T252 hp | 873 km 543 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 3)378 hp | 378 hp 282 kW | 6.1 s | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 2)328 hp | 328 hp 244 kW | 6.6 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 1)297 hp | 297 hp 222 kW | 7.0 s | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| HongqiH92.0T252 hp | 252 hp 188 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 3)378 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 2)328 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 1)297 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HongqiH92.0T252 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 3)378 hp |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 2)328 hp |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 1)297 hp |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| HongqiH92.0T252 hp |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Hongqi H9 2.0T (Stage 3) 378 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 3)378 hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 2)328 hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 1)297 hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| HongqiH92.0T252 hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 3)378 hp | 202 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 2)328 hp | 175 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| HongqiH92.0T (Stage 1)297 hp | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| HongqiH92.0T252 hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HongqiH92.0T (Stage 3)378 hp | HongqiH92.0T (Stage 2)328 hp | HongqiH92.0T (Stage 1)297 hp | HongqiH92.0T252 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 378 hp 282 kW | 328 hp 244 kW | 297 hp 222 kW | 252 hp 188 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 589 Nm 434 lb-ft | 513 Nm 378 lb-ft | 464 Nm 342 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.6 s | 7.0 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 873 km 543 mi | 873 km 543 mi | 873 km 543 mi | 873 km 543 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 202 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 175 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Hongqi H9 2.0T (Stage 3) 378 hp | Hongqi H9 2.0T (Stage 2) 328 hp | Hongqi H9 2.0T (Stage 1) 297 hp | Hongqi H9 2.0T 252 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Hongqi H9 2.0T (Stage 3) 378 hp
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 76 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Hongqi H9 2.0T (Stage 2) 328 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























