Honda Civic Type R (FK8) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Honda Civic Type R (FK8) · Facelift 2020 2.0vsVolkswagen Golf VIII R 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Golf VIII
R 2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Golf VIII R 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Honda Civic Type R (FK8) Facelift 2020 2.0
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Most powerful320 hp239 kW
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight225 hp/t168 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0 | VolkswagenGolf VIIIR 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,476kg3,254lb |
| Gross weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 2,030kg4,475lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.2s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 52.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.0s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 225hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 217hp/t162kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 282Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 285Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 597km371mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,996cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,557mm179in | 4,290mm169in |
| Width | 1,877mm74in | 1,789mm70in |
| Height | 1,434mm56in | 1,458mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,628mm103in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,541mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,602mm63in | 1,516mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 126mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 420L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,209L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 46L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Honda Civic Type R (FK8) Facelift 2020 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Golf VIII R 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIR 2.0 TSI | - | 2,100-5,350 rpm | 5,600 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0 | VolkswagenGolf VIIIR 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.0 s | 15.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0 | 320 hp 239 kW |
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIR 2.0 TSI | 320 hp 239 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIR 2.0 TSI | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0 | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIR 2.0 TSI | 1,476 kg 3,254 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0 | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIR 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0 | 5.8 s |
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIR 2.0 TSI | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Golf VIII R 2.0 TSI and Honda Civic Type R (FK8) Facelift 2020 2.0: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIR 2.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Golf VIII R 2.0 TSI and Honda Civic Type R (FK8) Facelift 2020 2.0: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0 | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIR 2.0 TSI | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0 | 320 hp 239 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIR 2.0 TSI | 320 hp 239 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIR 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIR 2.0 TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Golf VIII R 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIR 2.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0 | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIR 2.0 TSI | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0 | VolkswagenGolf VIIIR 2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,476 kg 3,254 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 597 km 371 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda Civic Type R (FK8) Facelift 2020 2.0 | Volkswagen Golf VIII R 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda Civic Type R (FK8) Facelift 2020 2.0
- Is 56 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volkswagen Golf VIII R 2.0 TSI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























