Honda Civic Type R (EP3) · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Honda Civic Type R (EP3) · Facelift 2003 2.0vsOpel Astra H GTC 2.0i 16V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonOpel Astra H GTC
2.0i 16V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Honda Civic Type R (EP3) Facelift 2003 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,204 kg2,654 lb
- Best power-to-weight166 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range562 km349 mi
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score83/100
Opel Astra H GTC 2.0i 16V Turbo
- Highest torque249 Nm184 lb-ft
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best practicality score67/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0 | OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 196Nm145lb-ft | 249Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,204kg2,654lb | 1,265kg2,789lb |
| Gross weight | 1,550kg3,417lb | 1,840kg4,057lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 85.0s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 31.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 562km349mi Calculated | 559km347mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,140mm163in | 4,290mm169in |
| Width | 1,695mm67in | 1,753mm69in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,575mm101in | 2,614mm103in |
| Front track | 1,472mm58in | 1,488mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,487mm59in | 1,488mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 125mm5in | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 315L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | 610L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 223g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Honda Civic Type R (EP3) Facelift 2003 2.0: Power / Torque
- Opel Astra H GTC 2.0i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0 | 7,400 rpm | 5,900 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 5,400 rpm | 1,950 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0 | OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 31.8 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0 | 196 Nm 145 lb-ft |
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 249 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0 | 1,204 kg 2,654 lb |
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 1,265 kg 2,789 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0 | 6.6 s |
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda Civic Type R (EP3) Facelift 2003 2.0 and Opel Astra H GTC 2.0i 16V Turbo: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0 | 562 km 349 mi |
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 559 km 347 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Honda Civic Type R (EP3) Facelift 2003 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0 | OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 196 Nm 145 lb-ft | 249 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,204 kg 2,654 lb | 1,265 kg 2,789 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 562 km 349 mi | 559 km 347 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 223 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda Civic Type R (EP3) Facelift 2003 2.0 | Opel Astra H GTC 2.0i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda Civic Type R (EP3) Facelift 2003 2.0
- Is 61 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 3 km (2 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Opel Astra H GTC 2.0i 16V Turbo
- Has 53 Nm more
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























