Honda Civic Type R (EP3)
Car comparison
Honda Civic Type R (EP3) 2.0vsVolkswagen Golf IV 2.8 VR6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Golf IV
2.8 VR6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Honda Civic Type R (EP3) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Lightest1,204 kg2,654 lb
- Best power-to-weight166 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk315 L
- Best economy score83/100
Volkswagen Golf IV 2.8 VR6
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score62/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 196Nm145lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,204kg2,654lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Gross weight | 1,550kg3,417lb | 1,910kg4,211lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 75.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.6s Calculated | 28.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 562km349mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 2,792cc170cu in |
| Length | 4,135mm163in | 4,149mm163in |
| Width | 1,695mm67in | 1,735mm68in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,439mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,575mm101in | 2,518mm99in |
| Front track | 1,472mm58in | 1,513mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,487mm59in | 1,487mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 315L | 245L |
| Max trunk volume | 610L | 1,185L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Honda Civic Type R (EP3) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Golf IV 2.8 VR6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 7,400 rpm | 5,900 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | 6,200 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.6 s | 28.2 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | 204 hp 152 kW |
Volkswagen Golf IV 2.8 VR6 has 4 hp more than Honda Civic Type R (EP3) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Honda Civic Type R (EP3) 2.0 and Volkswagen Golf IV 2.8 VR6: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 196 Nm 145 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 1,204 kg 2,654 lb |
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 6.8 s |
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | 7.1 s |
Although Volkswagen Golf IV 2.8 VR6 has more power, Honda Civic Type R (EP3) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda Civic Type R (EP3) 2.0 and Volkswagen Golf IV 2.8 VR6: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.1 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 196 Nm 145 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,204 kg 2,654 lb | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 562 km 349 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | 245 L 8.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda Civic Type R (EP3) 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda Civic Type R (EP3) 2.0
- Is 196 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volkswagen Golf IV 2.8 VR6
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 74 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























