Volvo V70 III
Car comparison
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5vsHonda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011
2.4 i-VTEC
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions195 g/km
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC
- Lightest1,636 kg3,607 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 201hp150kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 234Nm173lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,806kg3,982lb | 1,636kg3,607lb |
| Gross weight | 2,410kg5,313lb | - |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 77.6s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.5s Calculated | 36.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 143Nm/t96lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 747km464mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 2,354cc144cu in |
| Length | 4,823mm190in | 4,750mm187in |
| Width | - | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,547mm61in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,816mm111in | 2,705mm106in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,586mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 151mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 575L | 406L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,183L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 195g/km | 201g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,980 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 7,000 rpm | 4,300-4,400 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.5 s | 36.5 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 147 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 201 hp 150 kW |
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 has 39 hp more than Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC.
The biggest power difference is between Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 39 hp (29 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 234 Nm 173 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 1,806 kg 3,982 lb |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 1,636 kg 3,607 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 7.9 s |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 and Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 833 km 518 mi |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 747 km 464 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 201 hp 150 kW | 8.3 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 201 hp 150 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 234 Nm 173 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,806 kg 3,982 lb | 1,636 kg 3,607 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 747 km 464 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 195 g/km | 201 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | 406 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 | Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5
- Has 39 hp more
- Has 86 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 86 km (54 mi) more estimated range
- Has 169 L more trunk volume
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC
- Is 170 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























