Volkswagen Jetta V
Car comparison
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSIvsHonda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda Accord VII
2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk527 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Best estimated range722 km449 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 220Nm162lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,526kg3,364lb | 1,390kg3,064lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 67.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.7s Calculated | 30.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 688km427mi Calculated | 722km449mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,354cc144cu in |
| Length | 4,554mm179in | 4,665mm184in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,760mm69in |
| Height | 1,459mm57in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,512mm60in | 1,510mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 527L | 459L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 6,800 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.7 s | 30.5 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI has 10 hp more than Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S.
The biggest power difference is between Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S and Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 220 Nm 162 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 7.2 s |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 688 km 427 mi |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 722 km 449 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.2 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 220 Nm 162 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 688 km 427 mi | 722 km 449 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 527 L 18.6 cu ft | 459 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI | Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 68 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S
- Is 136 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 35 km (22 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























