Volkswagen Jetta V
Car comparison
Volkswagen Jetta V 1.4 TSIvsHonda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda Accord VII
2.4 i-VTEC 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Jetta V 1.4 TSI
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Highest torque240 Nm177 lb-ft
- Lightest1,370 kg3,020 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range753 km468 mi
- Largest trunk527 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenJetta V1.4 TSI | HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 220Nm162lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,370kg3,020lb | 1,390kg3,064lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 67.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.8s Calculated | 30.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 753km468mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,390cc85cu in | 2,354cc144cu in |
| Length | 4,554mm179in | 4,665mm184in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,760mm69in |
| Height | 1,459mm57in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,512mm60in | 1,510mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 527L | 459L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Jetta V 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
- Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V1.4 TSI | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 6,800 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenJetta V1.4 TSI | HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.8 s | 30.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V1.4 TSI | 170 hp 127 kW |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 190 hp 142 kW |
Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Jetta V 1.4 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 1.4 TSI and Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V1.4 TSI | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 220 Nm 162 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V1.4 TSI | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V1.4 TSI | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V1.4 TSI | 8.1 s |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V and Volkswagen Jetta V 1.4 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V1.4 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 1.4 TSI and Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V1.4 TSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V1.4 TSI | 753 km 468 mi |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V1.4 TSI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V1.4 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V1.4 TSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Jetta V 1.4 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V1.4 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V1.4 TSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenJetta V1.4 TSI | HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 220 Nm 162 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 753 km 468 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 527 L 18.6 cu ft | 459 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Jetta V 1.4 TSI | Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Jetta V 1.4 TSI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 39 km (24 mi) more estimated range
- Has 68 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























