Spyker C8 Laviolette
4.2i V8 40V
400 hp4172 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2001-2009
Car comparison
Spyker C8 Laviolette 4.2i V8 40VvsHolden Monaro 5.7 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Holden Monaro
5.7 V8
408 hp5655 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2001-2005
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Spyker C8 Laviolette 4.2i V8 40V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed310 km/h193 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lightest1,275 kg2,811 lb
- Best power-to-weight314 hp/t234 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best economy score0/100
Holden Monaro 5.7 V8
- Most powerful408 hp304 kW
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SpykerC8 Laviolette4.2i V8 40V | HoldenMonaro5.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 408hp304kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 460Nm339lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,275kg2,811lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.1s99% target: 307 km/h / 191 mph Calculated | 65.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.7s Calculated | 18.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 314hp/t234kW/t142hp/1000 lb Calculated | 249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 376Nm/t252lb-ft/ton Calculated | 280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,172cc255cu in | 5,655cc345cu in |
| Length | 4,185mm165in | 4,790mm189in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,245mm49in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,575mm101in | 2,790mm110in |
| Front track | 1,400mm55in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 370L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Spyker C8 Laviolette 4.2i V8 40VHolden Monaro 5.7 V8PowerTorque
- Spyker C8 Laviolette 4.2i V8 40V: Power / Torque
- Holden Monaro 5.7 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Laviolette4.2i V8 40V | 6,800 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| HoldenMonaro5.7 V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SpykerC8 Laviolette4.2i V8 40V | HoldenMonaro5.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.7 s | 18.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 122 mph | 173 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Laviolette4.2i V8 40V | 400 hp 298 kW |
| HoldenMonaro5.7 V8 | 408 hp 304 kW |
Holden Monaro 5.7 V8 has 8 hp more than Spyker C8 Laviolette 4.2i V8 40V.
The biggest power difference is between Spyker C8 Laviolette 4.2i V8 40V and Holden Monaro 5.7 V8: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Laviolette4.2i V8 40V | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| HoldenMonaro5.7 V8 | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Laviolette4.2i V8 40V | 1,275 kg 2,811 lb |
| HoldenMonaro5.7 V8 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Laviolette4.2i V8 40V | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| HoldenMonaro5.7 V8 | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Laviolette4.2i V8 40V | 4.5 s |
| HoldenMonaro5.7 V8 | 5.3 s |
Although Holden Monaro 5.7 V8 has more power, Spyker C8 Laviolette 4.2i V8 40V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Spyker C8 Laviolette 4.2i V8 40V and Holden Monaro 5.7 V8: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Laviolette4.2i V8 40V | 314 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| HoldenMonaro5.7 V8 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Laviolette4.2i V8 40V | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| HoldenMonaro5.7 V8 | 408 hp 304 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Laviolette4.2i V8 40V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HoldenMonaro5.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SpykerC8 Laviolette4.2i V8 40V | HoldenMonaro5.7 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 408 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,275 kg 2,811 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 314 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Spyker C8 Laviolette 4.2i V8 40V
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 365 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 55 km/h (34 mph) higher top speed
- Has 65 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Holden Monaro 5.7 V8
- Has 8 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Spyker C8 Laviolette 4.2i V8 40V
Holden Monaro 5.7 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
SpykerC8 Laviolette4.2i V8 40VvsMaseratiGranSport4.2 i V8 32V
HoldenMonaro5.7 V8vsFordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R
SpykerC8 Laviolette4.2i V8 40VvsFerrari360 Modena360 Challenge Stradale
HoldenMonaro5.7 V8vsChevroletCorvette Coupe (C5)5.7 i V8 16V Z06
SpykerC8 Laviolette4.2i V8 40VvsMaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V
HoldenMonaro5.7 V8vsMercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12
SpykerC8 Laviolette4.2i V8 40VvsPorsche911 (997)GT3 RS 3.6
HoldenMonaro5.7 V8vsPorsche911 (996)Facelift 2001Turbo 3.6
HoldenMonaro5.7 V8vsAston MartinDB7 Zagato5.9 V12
HoldenMonaro5.7 V8vsAston MartinDB7 GT5.9 i V12 48V
SpykerC8 Laviolette4.2i V8 40VvsAston MartinV8 Vantage4.3 i V8 32V
HoldenMonaro5.7 V8vsBentleyContinental T6.8 i V8