Jaguar XJ (X350)
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32VvsHolden Caprice (WH) 5.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHolden Caprice (WH)
5.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Best power-to-weight186 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score78/100
Holden Caprice (WH) 5.7 i V8
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque460 Nm339 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption14.0 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk560 L
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | HoldenCaprice (WH)5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 411Nm303lb-ft | 460Nm339lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 72.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 25.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 176hp/t132kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 780km485mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,196cc256cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 5,090mm200in | 5,237mm206in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,847mm73in |
| Height | 1,448mm57in | 1,459mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,034mm119in | 2,939mm116in |
| Front track | 1,556mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,577mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 560L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Holden Caprice (WH) 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| HoldenCaprice (WH)5.7 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | HoldenCaprice (WH)5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 25.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW |
| HoldenCaprice (WH)5.7 i V8 | 306 hp 228 kW |
Holden Caprice (WH) 5.7 i V8 has 6 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V and Holden Caprice (WH) 5.7 i V8: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft |
| HoldenCaprice (WH)5.7 i V8 | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| HoldenCaprice (WH)5.7 i V8 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCaprice (WH)5.7 i V8 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 6.6 s |
| HoldenCaprice (WH)5.7 i V8 | 7.7 s |
Although Holden Caprice (WH) 5.7 i V8 has more power, Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V and Holden Caprice (WH) 5.7 i V8: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| HoldenCaprice (WH)5.7 i V8 | 176 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCaprice (WH)5.7 i V8 | 306 hp 228 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HoldenCaprice (WH)5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | HoldenCaprice (WH)5.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 780 km 485 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 176 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Holden Caprice (WH) 5.7 i V8
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 49 Nm more
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























