Ginetta G40
Car comparison
Ginetta G40 R 2.0vsVolkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Largest trunk312 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Ginetta G40 R 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Lightest795 kg1,753 lb
- Best power-to-weight220 hp/t164 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | GinettaG40R 2.0 | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 175hp130kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 191Nm141lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 795kg1,753lb | 1,312kg2,892lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 90.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.2s Calculated | 31.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 859km534mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 3,748mm148in | 4,256mm168in |
| Width | 1,642mm65in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,045mm41in | 1,406mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,250mm89in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | - | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 100mm4in | 129mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 312L |
| Max trunk volume | 200L | 1,006L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ginetta G40 R 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| GinettaG40R 2.0 | 6,700 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 4,200-6,200 rpm | 1,250-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | GinettaG40R 2.0 | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.2 s | 31.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| GinettaG40R 2.0 | 175 hp 130 kW |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI has 5 hp more than Ginetta G40 R 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Ginetta G40 R 2.0 and Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| GinettaG40R 2.0 | 191 Nm 141 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| GinettaG40R 2.0 | 795 kg 1,753 lb |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 1,312 kg 2,892 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| GinettaG40R 2.0 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| GinettaG40R 2.0 | 5.8 s |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 7.4 s |
Although Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI has more power, Ginetta G40 R 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ginetta G40 R 2.0 and Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI: 1.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| GinettaG40R 2.0 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| GinettaG40R 2.0 | 175 hp 130 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GinettaG40R 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | GinettaG40R 2.0 | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 175 hp 130 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 191 Nm 141 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 795 kg 1,753 lb | 1,312 kg 2,892 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 859 km 534 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | 312 L 11.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ginetta G40 R 2.0
- Is 517 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 83 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 89 Nm more
- Has 112 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























