Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220dvsGenesis G70 · Facelift 2020 2.0 T-GDi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonGenesis G70 · Facelift 2020
2.0 T-GDi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed239 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Genesis G70 Facelift 2020 2.0 T-GDi
- Lightest1,675 kg3,693 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | GenesisG70Facelift 20202.0 T-GDi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 197hp147kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 353Nm260lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,705kg3,759lb | 1,675kg3,693lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 2,140kg4,718lb |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.1s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated | 76.9s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 35.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 682km424mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,993cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,685mm184in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,582mm62in | 1,592mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,596mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 330L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d: Power / Torque
- Genesis G70 Facelift 2020 2.0 T-GDi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 4,200 rpm | 1,800-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| GenesisG70Facelift 20202.0 T-GDi | 6,200 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | GenesisG70Facelift 20202.0 T-GDi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 35.8 s |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 200 hp 149 kW |
| GenesisG70Facelift 20202.0 T-GDi | 197 hp 147 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d has 3 hp more than Genesis G70 Facelift 2020 2.0 T-GDi.
The biggest power difference is between Genesis G70 Facelift 2020 2.0 T-GDi and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| GenesisG70Facelift 20202.0 T-GDi | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
| GenesisG70Facelift 20202.0 T-GDi | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| GenesisG70Facelift 20202.0 T-GDi | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 7.4 s |
| GenesisG70Facelift 20202.0 T-GDi | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d and Genesis G70 Facelift 2020 2.0 T-GDi: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| GenesisG70Facelift 20202.0 T-GDi | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d and Genesis G70 Facelift 2020 2.0 T-GDi: 4.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| GenesisG70Facelift 20202.0 T-GDi | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 833 km 518 mi |
| GenesisG70Facelift 20202.0 T-GDi | 682 km 424 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.4 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| GenesisG70Facelift 20202.0 T-GDi | 197 hp 147 kW | 8.8 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| GenesisG70Facelift 20202.0 T-GDi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| GenesisG70Facelift 20202.0 T-GDi |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| GenesisG70Facelift 20202.0 T-GDi | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| GenesisG70Facelift 20202.0 T-GDi | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | GenesisG70Facelift 20202.0 T-GDi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 197 hp 147 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 682 km 424 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d | Genesis G70 Facelift 2020 2.0 T-GDi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 87 Nm more
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 152 km (94 mi) more estimated range
- Has 125 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Genesis G70 Facelift 2020 2.0 T-GDi
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























