Car comparison

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX II

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018
VS

Volkswagen Sharan II

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Fastest top speed
    226 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    345 Nm
    254 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,704 kg
    3,757 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    141 hp/t
    105 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    180 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    886 km
    551 mi
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Power
240hp179kW
200hp149kW
Torque
345Nm254lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,704kg3,757lb
1,790kg3,946lb
Gross weight
2,510kg5,534lb
2,360kg5,203lb
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
98.4s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph
Calculated
100.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
40.0s
Calculated
47.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
156Nm/t105lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
886km551mi
Calculated
833km518mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,796mm189in
4,854mm191in
Width
1,916mm75in
1,904mm75in
Height
1,655mm65in
1,720mm68in
Wheelbase
2,849mm112in
2,919mm115in
Front track
1,606mm63in
1,569mm62in
Rear track
1,606mm63in
1,617mm64in
Ground clearance
150mm6in
-
Trunk volume
285L
885L
Max trunk volume
2,020L
2,430L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions
180g/km
196g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoostVolkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost5,400 rpm2,300-4,900 rpm5,650 rpm
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI5,100 rpm1,700-5,000 rpm5,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.0 s
47.2 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost has 40 hp more than Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost: 40 hp (30 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
1,790 kg
3,946 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
226 km/h
140 mph
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost8.4 s
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI8.3 s

Although Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost has more power, Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
886 km
551 mi
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
833 km
518 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
8.4 s
226 km/h
140 mph
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
8.3 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
885 L
31.3 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.4 s
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.3 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
1,790 kg
3,946 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
885 L
31.3 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in
Range score
886 km
551 mi
833 km
518 mi
CO2 score
180 g/km
196 g/km
Trunk score
285 L
10.1 cu ft
885 L
31.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoostVolkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 40 hp more
  • Has 65 Nm more
  • Is 86 kg lighter
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 53 km (33 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 16 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI

  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 600 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDCi
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
225i
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost vs Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster