Car comparison

Zeekr 009 116 kWhvsFord S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Zeekr 009

116 kWh

340 hpElectricFWDAutomaticMinivan / MPV2024-present
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Zeekr 009 116 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    340 hp
    254 kW
  • Largest trunk
    574 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelZeekr009116 kWhFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Power
340hp254kW
240hp179kW
Torque
373Nm275lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
2,770kg6,107lb
1,766kg3,893lb
Gross weight-
2,575kg5,677lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
109.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
96.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
47.0s
Calculated
46.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
135Nm/t90lb-ft/ton
Calculated
283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
1,111km690mi
Calculated
Displacement-
1,997cc122cu in
Length
5,209mm205in
4,796mm189in
Width
2,024mm80in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,812mm71in
1,655mm65in
Wheelbase
3,205mm126in
2,849mm112in
Front track
1,702mm67in
1,606mm63in
Rear track
1,714mm67in
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance
142mm6in
150mm6in
Trunk volume
574L
285L
Max trunk volume
2,979L
2,020L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
7
Fuel tank-
70L
CO2 emissions-
162g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricZeekr009116 kWhFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
47.0 s
46.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Zeekr009116 kWh
340 hp
254 kW
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
240 hp
179 kW

Zeekr 009 116 kWh has 100 hp more than Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue.

The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue and Zeekr 009 116 kWh: 100 hp (75 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Zeekr009116 kWh
373 Nm
275 lb-ft
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Zeekr009116 kWh
2,770 kg
6,107 lb
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
1,766 kg
3,893 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Zeekr009116 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Zeekr009116 kWh7.9 s
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue8.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Zeekr 009 116 kWh and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: 0.7 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Zeekr009116 kWh
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Zeekr009116 kWh
340 hp
254 kW
7.9 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Zeekr009116 kWh
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
574 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
5,209 mm
205.1 in
Height
1,812 mm
71.3 in
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleZeekr009116 kWhFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Power
340 hp
254 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
373 Nm
275 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
2,770 kg
6,107 lb
1,766 kg
3,893 lb
Fuel consumption
-
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
574 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
5,209 mm
205.1 in
Height
1,812 mm
71.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Range score
-
1,111 km
690 mi
CO2 score
-
162 g/km
Trunk score
574 L
20.3 cu ft
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,654 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Zeekr 009 116 kWh

  • Has 100 hp more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 289 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue

  • Has 127 Nm more
  • Is 1,004 kg lighter
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Zeekr 009 116 kWh
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

116 kWh
3.5 V6
VS
Zeekr009116 kWhvsToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
116 kWh
220d
VS
Zeekr009116 kWhvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
116 kWh
1.5 TSI ACT
VS
Zeekr009116 kWhvsVolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
116 kWh
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
VS
Zeekr009116 kWhvsFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
116 kWh
220d
VS
Zeekr009116 kWhvsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
Zeekr 009 116 kWh vs Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue - car comparison - FastVsFaster