Ford S-MAX II
Car comparison
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoostvsFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010
2.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range886 km551 mi
- Largest trunk285 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score80/100
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Lightest1,661 kg3,662 lb
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 203hp151kW |
| Torque | 345Nm254lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 1,704kg3,757lb | 1,661kg3,662lb |
| Gross weight | 2,510kg5,534lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 97.7s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 107.3s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.8s Calculated | 46.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Estimated range | 886km551mi Calculated | 864km537mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,796mm189in | 4,903mm193in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 2,154mm85in |
| Height | 1,655mm65in | 1,660mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,849mm112in | - |
| Front track | 1,606mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 150mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 285L | 285L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,020L | 2,000L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 180g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.8 s | 46.5 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 240 hp 179 kW |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 203 hp 151 kW |
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost has 37 hp more than Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost: 37 hp (28 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 8.4 s |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 886 km 551 mi |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 864 km 537 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 240 hp 179 kW | 8.4 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 203 hp 151 kW | 8.5 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 203 hp 151 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 345 Nm 254 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 886 km 551 mi | 864 km 537 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 180 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost | Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost
- Has 37 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 22 km (14 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Is 43 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























