Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) AMG CLE 53vsFord Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang VII
Dark Horse 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) AMG CLE 53
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Largest trunk410 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8
- Most powerful453 hp338 kW
- Lightest1,742 kg3,840 lb
- Best power-to-weight260 hp/t194 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53 | FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 449hp335kW | 453hp338kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 540Nm398lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,925kg4,244lb | 1,742kg3,840lb |
| Gross weight | 2,420kg5,335lb | 2,145kg4,729lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 263 km/h 163 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 66.9s99% target: 260 km/h / 162 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.8s Calculated | 17.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated | 310Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 670km416mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,999cc183cu in | 5,038cc307cu in |
| Length | 4,853mm191in | 4,819mm190in |
| Width | 1,936mm76in | 1,917mm75in |
| Height | 1,435mm56in | 1,403mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,875mm113in | 2,719mm107in |
| Front track | 1,661mm65in | 1,595mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | 1,643mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 110mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 381L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) AMG CLE 53: Power / Torque
- Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53 | 5,800-6,100 rpm | 2,200-5,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 7,250 rpm | 5,100 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53 | FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.8 s | 17.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 263 km/h 163 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53 | 449 hp 335 kW |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 453 hp 338 kW |
Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8 has 4 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) AMG CLE 53.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) AMG CLE 53 and Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53 | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 1,742 kg 3,840 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 263 km/h 163 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53 | 4.2 s |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 5.2 s |
Although Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) AMG CLE 53 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) AMG CLE 53 and Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) AMG CLE 53 and Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53 | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53 | 449 hp 335 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 453 hp 338 kW | 5.2 s | 263 km/h 163 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) AMG CLE 53 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53 | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53 | FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 449 hp 335 kW | 453 hp 338 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 263 km/h 163 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb | 1,742 kg 3,840 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 670 km 416 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 381 L 13.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) AMG CLE 53 | Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) AMG CLE 53
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 29 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 183 kg lighter
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























