Ford Mustang VI · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Ford Mustang VI · Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) · Facelift 2024 EQS 500 125 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) · Facelift 2024
EQS 500 125 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed249 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Lightest1,669 kg3,680 lb
- Best power-to-weight270 hp/t201 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score72/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 EQS 500 125 kWh
- Highest torque828 Nm611 lb-ft
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024EQS 500 125 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 449hp335kW |
| Torque | 529Nm390lb-ft | 828Nm611lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,669kg3,680lb | 2,580kg5,688lb |
| Gross weight | 2,105kg4,641lb | 3,205kg7,066lb |
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.3s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 63.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.5s Calculated | 27.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 270hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated | 321Nm/t215lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 466km289mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,038cc307cu in | - |
| Length | 4,789mm189in | 5,223mm206in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,382mm54in | 1,512mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,720mm107in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,642mm65in | 1,667mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,642mm65in | 1,682mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 144mm6in | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 408L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,700L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024EQS 500 125 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.5 s | 27.8 s |
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024EQS 500 125 kWh | 449 hp 335 kW |
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 has 1 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 EQS 500 125 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 EQS 500 125 kWh and Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024EQS 500 125 kWh | 828 Nm 611 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 1,669 kg 3,680 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024EQS 500 125 kWh | 2,580 kg 5,688 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024EQS 500 125 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024EQS 500 125 kWh | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 EQS 500 125 kWh: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024EQS 500 125 kWh | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.6 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024EQS 500 125 kWh | 449 hp 335 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024EQS 500 125 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024EQS 500 125 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 449 hp 335 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft | 828 Nm 611 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,669 kg 3,680 lb | 2,580 kg 5,688 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 466 km 289 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 408 L 14.4 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 911 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed
- Has 96 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 EQS 500 125 kWh
- Has 299 Nm more
- Has 212 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























