Ford Mustang VI · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Ford Mustang VI · Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) · Facelift 2026 EQS 500 122 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) · Facelift 2026
EQS 500 122 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2026 EQS 500 122 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Most powerful476 hp355 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Fastest top speed249 km/h155 mph
- Lightest1,669 kg3,680 lb
- Best power-to-weight270 hp/t201 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 500 122 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 476hp355kW |
| Torque | 529Nm390lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,669kg3,680lb | 2,660kg5,864lb |
| Gross weight | 2,105kg4,641lb | 3,205kg7,066lb |
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.3s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 57.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.5s Calculated | 25.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 270hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 466km289mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,038cc307cu in | - |
| Length | 4,789mm189in | 5,225mm206in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,382mm54in | 1,510mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,720mm107in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,642mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,642mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | 144mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 408L | 610L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 500 122 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.5 s | 25.5 s |
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 500 122 kWh | 476 hp 355 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2026 EQS 500 122 kWh has 26 hp more than Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2026 EQS 500 122 kWh: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 500 122 kWh | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 1,669 kg 3,680 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 500 122 kWh | 2,660 kg 5,864 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 500 122 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 500 122 kWh | 4.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2026 EQS 500 122 kWh and Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 500 122 kWh | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.6 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 500 122 kWh | 476 hp 355 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 500 122 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 500 122 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 476 hp 355 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,669 kg 3,680 lb | 2,660 kg 5,864 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 466 km 289 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 408 L 14.4 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Is 991 kg lighter
- Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed
- Has 91 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2026 EQS 500 122 kWh
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 221 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 202 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























