Car comparison

Ford Mustang VI · Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) · Facelift 2026 EQS 450+ 122 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Mustang VI · Facelift 2017

GT/CS 5.0 V8

450 hp5038 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedLiftback / fastback2022-2023
VS

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) · Facelift 2026

EQS 450+ 122 kWh

408 hpElectricRWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2026-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    249 km/h
    155 mph
  • Most powerful
    450 hp
    336 kW
  • Highest torque
    529 Nm
    390 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,669 kg
    3,680 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    270 hp/t
    201 kW/t
    3.7 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    78/100
  • Best economy score
    72/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 450+ 122 kWh
Power
450hp336kW
408hp304kW
Torque
529Nm390lb-ft
505Nm372lb-ft
Curb weight
1,669kg3,680lb
2,550kg5,622lb
Gross weight
2,105kg4,641lb
3,120kg6,878lb
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
58.3s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph
Calculated
78.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
17.5s
Calculated
34.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.4s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
270hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb
Calculated
160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton
Calculated
198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
466km289mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
5,038cc307cu in
-
Length
4,789mm189in
5,225mm206in
Width
1,916mm75in
1,926mm76in
Height
1,382mm54in
1,510mm59in
Wheelbase
2,720mm107in
3,210mm126in
Front track
1,642mm65in
-
Rear track
1,642mm65in
-
Ground clearance
144mm6in
-
Trunk volume
408L
610L
Doors
2
5
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
61L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 450+ 122 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.4 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.5 s
34.1 s
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.7 s
11.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
177 km/h
110 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
450 hp
336 kW
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 450+ 122 kWh
408 hp
304 kW

Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 has 42 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2026 EQS 450+ 122 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2026 EQS 450+ 122 kWh and Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: 42 hp (31 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
529 Nm
390 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 450+ 122 kWh
505 Nm
372 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
1,669 kg
3,680 lb
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 450+ 122 kWh
2,550 kg
5,622 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
249 km/h
155 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 450+ 122 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V84.6 s
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 450+ 122 kWh5.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2026 EQS 450+ 122 kWh: 1.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
270 hp/t
201 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 450+ 122 kWh
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
450 hp
336 kW
4.6 s
249 km/h
155 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 450+ 122 kWh
408 hp
304 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
408 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,789 mm
188.5 in
Height
1,382 mm
54.4 in
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 450+ 122 kWh
Power
408 hp
304 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
5,225 mm
205.7 in
Height
1,510 mm
59.4 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 450+ 122 kWh
Power
450 hp
336 kW
408 hp
304 kW
Torque
529 Nm
390 lb-ft
505 Nm
372 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
5.9 s
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,669 kg
3,680 lb
2,550 kg
5,622 lb
Fuel consumption
13.1 L/100 km
18.0 mpg US
21.6 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
408 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,789 mm
188.5 in
Height
1,382 mm
54.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
5,225 mm
205.7 in
Height
1,510 mm
59.4 in
Range score
466 km
289 mi
-
Trunk score
408 L
14.4 cu ft
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
270 hp/t
201 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
Consumption13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.93 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi36.89 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,439 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8

  • Has 42 hp more
  • Has 24 Nm more
  • Is 881 kg lighter
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 110 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Mustang VI GT/CS 5.0 V8
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 450+ 122 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GT/CS 5.0 V8
GT/CS 5.0 V8
VS
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8vsFordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
EQS 450+ 122 kWh
EQS 500 125 kWh
VS
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 450+ 122 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024EQS 500 125 kWh
GT/CS 5.0 V8
Dark Horse 5.0 V8
VS
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8vsFordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
EQS 450+ 122 kWh
EQS 450+ 120 kWh
VS
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 450+ 122 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 450+ 120 kWh
GT/CS 5.0 V8
GT 5.0 V8
VS
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8vsFordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8
EQS 450+ 122 kWh
100 kWh
VS
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 450+ 122 kWhvsAUDIE5 Sportback100 kWh
GT/CS 5.0 V8
4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R
VS
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8vsFordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R
EQS 450+ 122 kWh
performance 100 kWh
VS
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 450+ 122 kWhvsAUDIA6 Sportback e-tron (GH)performance 100 kWh
GT/CS 5.0 V8
4.6 i V8 24V
VS
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8vsFordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
EQS 450+ 122 kWh
78 kWh
VS
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 450+ 122 kWhvsPolestar278 kWh
GT/CS 5.0 V8
2.9 TFSI V6
VS
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8vsAUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 20202.9 TFSI V6
EQS 450+ 122 kWh
2.9 TFSI V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 450+ 122 kWhvsAUDIS7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 20232.9 TFSI V6
Ford Mustang VI · Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 vs Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) · Facelift 2026 EQS 450+ 122 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster