Zeekr 009
Car comparison
Zeekr 009 116 kWhvsFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Galaxy III
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Zeekr 009 116 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful612 hp456 kW
- Highest torque693 Nm511 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight213 hp/t159 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk574 L
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score76/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
- Lightest1,704 kg3,757 lb
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Zeekr009116 kWh | FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 612hp456kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 693Nm511lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,870kg6,327lb | 1,704kg3,757lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,620kg5,776lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 52.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 97.2s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.8s Calculated | 48.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 213hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,111km690mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 5,209mm205in | 4,848mm191in |
| Width | 2,024mm80in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,812mm71in | 1,747mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 3,205mm126in | 2,849mm112in |
| Front track | 1,702mm67in | 1,606mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,714mm67in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 142mm6in | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 574L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,979L | 2,339L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 163g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Zeekr009116 kWh | FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.8 s | 48.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Zeekr009116 kWh | 612 hp 456 kW |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | 240 hp 179 kW |
Zeekr 009 116 kWh has 372 hp more than Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo and Zeekr 009 116 kWh: 372 hp (277 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Zeekr009116 kWh | 693 Nm 511 lb-ft |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Zeekr009116 kWh | 2,870 kg 6,327 lb |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Zeekr009116 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Zeekr009116 kWh | 4.5 s |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Zeekr 009 116 kWh and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo: 4.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Zeekr009116 kWh | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeekr009116 kWh | 612 hp 456 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | 240 hp 179 kW | 8.7 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zeekr009116 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Zeekr009116 kWh | FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 612 hp 456 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 693 Nm 511 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,870 kg 6,327 lb | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,111 km 690 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 163 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 574 L 20.3 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Zeekr 009 116 kWh
- Has 372 hp more
- Has 193 Nm more
- Is 4.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 72 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 274 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
- Is 1,166 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























