Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0dvsFord Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014
1.5 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest CO2 emissions111 g/km
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
- Most powerful182 hp136 kW
- Lightest1,334 kg2,941 lb
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 182hp136kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,550kg3,417lb | 1,334kg2,941lb |
| Gross weight | 2,135kg4,707lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 71.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.7s Calculated | 35.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 277Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 180Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 982km610mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,499cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,534mm179in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,823mm72in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,648mm104in |
| Front track | - | 1,544mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 372L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 56L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 111g/km | 137g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.7 s | 35.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 3.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW |
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost has 2 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 1,334 kg 2,941 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 7.8 s |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 8.7 s |
Although Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW | 8.7 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 182 hp 136 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | 1,334 kg 2,941 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 982 km 610 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 111 g/km | 137 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 372 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Has 190 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 83 L more trunk volume
- Emits 26 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 216 kg lighter
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























