Volkswagen Polo VI
Car comparison
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSIvsFord Fiesta VII (MK7) · Facelift 2012 ST 1.6 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Fiesta VII (MK7) · Facelift 2012
ST 1.6 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk305 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Ford Fiesta VII (MK7) Facelift 2012 ST 1.6 EcoBoost
- Lightest1,088 kg2,399 lb
- Best power-to-weight184 hp/t137 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Best estimated range787 km489 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | FordFiesta VII (MK7)Facelift 2012ST 1.6 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 290Nm214lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,280kg2,822lb | 1,088kg2,399lb |
| Gross weight | 1,780kg3,924lb | 1,575kg3,472lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.2s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 68.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.8s Calculated | 27.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 184hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 678km421mi Calculated | 787km489mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,596cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,067mm160in | 3,982mm157in |
| Width | 1,751mm69in | 1,709mm67in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,456mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,549mm100in | 2,489mm98in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,496mm59in | - |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 305L | 276L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,079L | 960L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 140g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Ford Fiesta VII (MK7) Facelift 2012 ST 1.6 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 4,390-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,350 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| FordFiesta VII (MK7)Facelift 2012ST 1.6 EcoBoost | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | FordFiesta VII (MK7)Facelift 2012ST 1.6 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.8 s | 27.7 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| FordFiesta VII (MK7)Facelift 2012ST 1.6 EcoBoost | 200 hp 149 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| FordFiesta VII (MK7)Facelift 2012ST 1.6 EcoBoost | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
| FordFiesta VII (MK7)Facelift 2012ST 1.6 EcoBoost | 1,088 kg 2,399 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| FordFiesta VII (MK7)Facelift 2012ST 1.6 EcoBoost | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
| FordFiesta VII (MK7)Facelift 2012ST 1.6 EcoBoost | 6.7 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| FordFiesta VII (MK7)Facelift 2012ST 1.6 EcoBoost | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| FordFiesta VII (MK7)Facelift 2012ST 1.6 EcoBoost | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 678 km 421 mi |
| FordFiesta VII (MK7)Facelift 2012ST 1.6 EcoBoost | 787 km 489 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.7 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| FordFiesta VII (MK7)Facelift 2012ST 1.6 EcoBoost | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordFiesta VII (MK7)Facelift 2012ST 1.6 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordFiesta VII (MK7)Facelift 2012ST 1.6 EcoBoost |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| FordFiesta VII (MK7)Facelift 2012ST 1.6 EcoBoost | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| FordFiesta VII (MK7)Facelift 2012ST 1.6 EcoBoost | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | FordFiesta VII (MK7)Facelift 2012ST 1.6 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | 1,088 kg 2,399 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 678 km 421 mi | 787 km 489 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 140 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 305 L 10.8 cu ft | 276 L 9.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI | Ford Fiesta VII (MK7) Facelift 2012 ST 1.6 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 29 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Ford Fiesta VII (MK7) Facelift 2012 ST 1.6 EcoBoost
- Is 192 kg lighter
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 109 km (68 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























