Tesla Model Y
Performance 80.5 kWh
534 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2021-2025
Car comparison
Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWhvsFisker Ocean Extreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Fisker Ocean
Extreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range
564 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2022-2024
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,995 kg4,398 lb
- Best power-to-weight268 hp/t200 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk854 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Fisker Ocean Extreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range
- Most powerful564 hp421 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | FiskerOceanExtreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 534hp398kW | 564hp421kW |
| Torque | - | 737Nm544lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 2,436kg5,370lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,974kg6,557lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 35.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 35.6s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.2s Calculated | 26.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 268hp/t200kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 303Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,775mm188in |
| Width | 1,921mm76in | 1,990mm78in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,629mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,890mm114in | 2,921mm115in |
| Front track | 1,646mm65in | 1,696mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,630mm64in | 1,732mm68in |
| Ground clearance | 167mm7in | 180mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 854L | 476L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,158L | 918L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | FiskerOceanExtreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.2 s | 26.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 126 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 534 hp 398 kW |
| FiskerOceanExtreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range | 564 hp 421 kW |
Fisker Ocean Extreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range has 30 hp more than Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh and Fisker Ocean Extreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range: 30 hp (22 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
| FiskerOceanExtreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range | 2,436 kg 5,370 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FiskerOceanExtreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range | 206 km/h 128 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 3.7 s |
| FiskerOceanExtreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range | 4.2 s |
Although Fisker Ocean Extreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range has more power, Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh and Fisker Ocean Extreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| FiskerOceanExtreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 534 hp 398 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FiskerOceanExtreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range | 564 hp 421 kW | 4.2 s | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FiskerOceanExtreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | FiskerOceanExtreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 534 hp 398 kW | 564 hp 421 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 737 Nm 544 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | 2,436 kg 5,370 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 854 L 30.2 cu ft | 476 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh
- Is 441 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 54 km/h (34 mph) higher top speed
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 378 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Fisker Ocean Extreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range
- Has 30 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh
Fisker Ocean Extreme/One 113 kWh Hyper Range
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWhvsTeslaModel Y JuniperFacelift 2025Performance 84.7 kWh
FiskerOceanExtreme/One 113 kWh Hyper RangevsMercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh
TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWhvsTeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh
FiskerOceanExtreme/One 113 kWh Hyper RangevsMaseratiGrecaleFolgore 105 kWh
TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWhvsTeslaModel XFacelift 2021Long Range 100 kWh
FiskerOceanExtreme/One 113 kWh Hyper RangevsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWhvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
FiskerOceanExtreme/One 113 kWh Hyper RangevsTeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWh
FiskerOceanExtreme/One 113 kWh Hyper RangevsPolestar3111 kWh
TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWhvsAUDIRSQ8 (4M)Facelift 20244.0 TFSI V8
FiskerOceanExtreme/One 113 kWh Hyper RangevsAUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh
FiskerOceanExtreme/One 113 kWh Hyper RangevsMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Folgore 105 kWh