Ferrari Testarossa
Car comparison
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48VvsPorsche 928 5.0 GT V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 928
5.0 GT V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph
- Most powerful380 hp283 kW
- Highest torque474 Nm350 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight224 hp/t167 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,009 km627 mi
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score76/100
Porsche 928 5.0 GT V8
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Lowest highway consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Best overall score63/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | Porsche9285.0 GT V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 380hp283kW | 330hp246kW |
| Torque | 474Nm350lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 85.0s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.7s Calculated | 19.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 224hp/t167kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated | 209hp/t156kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 279Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,009km627mi Calculated | 393km244mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,942cc302cu in | 4,957cc302cu in |
| Length | 4,485mm177in | 4,520mm178in |
| Width | 1,975mm78in | 1,836mm72in |
| Height | 1,130mm44in | 1,282mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,550mm100in | 2,500mm98in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,551mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,660mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 115L | 86L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V: Power / Torque
- Porsche 928 5.0 GT V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 5,750 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 6,200 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | Porsche9285.0 GT V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.7 s | 19.7 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 380 hp 283 kW |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 330 hp 246 kW |
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V has 50 hp more than Porsche 928 5.0 GT V8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 928 5.0 GT V8 and Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 474 Nm 350 lb-ft |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 275 km/h 171 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 5.7 s |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V and Porsche 928 5.0 GT V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 21.9 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V and Porsche 928 5.0 GT V8: 10.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 1,009 km 627 mi |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 393 km 244 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 380 hp 283 kW | 5.7 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.8 s | 275 km/h 171 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 |
| 21.9 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 21.9 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.9 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 21.9 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 380 hp 283 kW | 330 hp 246 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 474 Nm 350 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | 275 km/h 171 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 21.9 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,009 km 627 mi | 393 km 244 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V | Porsche 928 5.0 GT V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 21.9 L/100 km10.7 mpg US12.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 38.32 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 61.68 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 3,285 L868 US gal723 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 5,749 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 44 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 10.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 616 km (383 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Porsche 928 5.0 GT V8
- Is 120 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























