Ferrari Testarossa
Car comparison
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48VvsPorsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930) 3.3 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930)
3.3 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930) 3.3 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Lightest1,335 kg2,943 lb
- Best power-to-weight225 hp/t168 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score64/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph
- Most powerful380 hp283 kW
- Highest torque474 Nm350 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 380hp283kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 474Nm350lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,335kg2,943lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 87.6s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 69.9s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.7s Calculated | 17.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 224hp/t167kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated | 225hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 279Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 322Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,009km627mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,942cc302cu in | 3,299cc201cu in |
| Length | 4,485mm177in | 4,291mm169in |
| Width | 1,975mm78in | 1,775mm70in |
| Height | 1,130mm44in | 1,310mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,550mm100in | 2,272mm89in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,432mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,660mm65in | 1,492mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 130mm5in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 115L | 81L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930) 3.3 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 5,750 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | 5,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.7 s | 17.0 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 178 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 380 hp 283 kW |
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | 300 hp 224 kW |
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V has 80 hp more than Porsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930) 3.3 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930) 3.3 Turbo and Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V: 80 hp (60 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 474 Nm 350 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 5.7 s |
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | 5.2 s |
Although Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V has more power, Porsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930) 3.3 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930) 3.3 Turbo and Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 380 hp 283 kW | 5.7 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 380 hp 283 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 474 Nm 350 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,009 km 627 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V
- Has 80 hp more
- Has 44 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Porsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930) 3.3 Turbo
- Is 365 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























